Excerpt for Arbor Day: Lester R. Brown

“An analysis of the value of planting trees on the streets and in the parks of five western U.S. cities—from Cheyenne in Wyoming to Berkeley in California—concluded that for every $1 spent on planting and caring for trees, the benefits to the community exceeded $2. A mature tree canopy in a city shades buildings and can reduce air temperatures by 5–10 degrees Fahrenheit, thus reducing the energy needed for air conditioning. In cities with severe winters like Cheyenne, the reduction of winter wind speed by evergreen trees cuts heating costs. Real estate values on tree-lined streets are typically 3–6 percent higher than where there are few or no trees.”

Brown, Lester R. Plan B 4.0: Mobilizing To Save Civilization

About these ads

Point of Clarification

“…so [President Obama] puts a moratorium on drilling in the gulf (except for two in the past month)…” Letter to the Editor, Indianapolis Star, 16 April 2011

Actually, fellow reader, a point of clarification on the number of deep water drilling permits issued since the moratorium was lifted on 12 October 2011: The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEMRE) issued a press release on April 8 announcing that the tenth deepwater drilling permit had been approved. (They also announced they would end the practice of issuing press releases for new deepwater well permit approvals.)

27 permits for deepwater drilling of new wells and revised new wells have been approved since October 12, according to BOEMRE’s website (table: “Deepwater Permits to Drill”).

Monday: Quotes for Breakfast

“Thank God for smart women in the Obama administration.” Lindsey Graham

“‘Operation Odyssey Dawn?’ Princess Leia’s gonna come save the day.” Jeremy Scahill

“I think, for the most part, when we do doctrines, we end our thinking. Foreign policy has got to depend on choices…Doctrines remove choice. They tell you the answer before you even have the questions, let alone the evidence.” Leslie Gelb

“Well, again, one of the things we should learn in the Middle East is that bad situations always have the potential to get worse.” Richard Haas

“But there’s always this question of: Do you, if you can’t do something everywhere, do you do nothing someplace?” Madeleine Albright

“Wars begin where you will, but they do not end where you please.” Niccolò Machiavelli

“Republicans fall in line. Democrats fall in love.” Mark Shields

“Yes, the will of the people matters a great deal. Indeed, in a democracy, few things are more deserving of deference. But still, one draws up short at the idea that human rights are subject to a popularity contest.” Leonard Pitts

“If the bee disappeared off the surface of the globe then man would only have four years of life left.” Attributed, probably falsely, to Albert Einstein

“The argument to me is simply, fundamentally: How far are we willing to go with our experiment to see how little biodiversity we actually need? …To me, it’s an unwinnable experiment.” Verlyn Klinkenborg

International Day of Snow

So: here it is, then, the topsy-turvy world I vaguely remember from Brave New World. A world where the absurdity is so great that it frequently occasionally feels as though the world has flipped absolutely over and up has become down and everything has changed so rapidly, so unalterably, and so inexplicably that nothing really makes sense.

For example, Chilean coal miners will have to live in a hole underground for three to four months, BP oil spills in the Gulf and we add chemicals on top of it and scientists admit that no one knows what any of it on that scale will mean in the long term. We routinely blast the tops from mountains and push the peaks into the rivers below, so we destroy two things simultaneously and we barely even shrug. We invent nuclear power. We expand its use,  even though we’re still not sure what to do with the spent rods when they can’t be recycled any longer. So we bury them: radioactive bones hidden by the dog-people.  We frack. And all of it, for what? So there can be a light in the refrigerator. So that even our closets can be air-conditioned. And things like that seem absurdly frivolous to exchange human lives and the earth for.

We feed grass-eating animals corn. And then we supplement the corn with soybeans. And then we supplement that with meat by-product. So we have cows eating cows and corn and soybeans and chickens unwittingly cannibalizing chickens. And then, because they seem so unhealthy, we hop them up on antibiotics. And then we decide that, with chickens especially, they’re really just too, well, chicken-like and so we genetically modify them. All of which seems less than humane. And why? So McDonald’s can give us nuggets for a quarter apiece on Thursdays and so kids will have an excuse to eat more ketchup. And that seems a bit strange, too.

And there’s the sex life of frogs to consider. You know, the frogs with three legs or six eyes or what have you. The ones with rapidly diminishing male populations because the assorted melange of Prozac, hormone replacements, Rogaine, pesticide, and road salt in the waterways seems to affect hormone production and encourage strange genetic mutations. Endocrine disruption from microscopic amounts of chemicals that can’t quite be filtered out or eradicated. And it seems to have hit certain amphibious species first, which really sucks if you’re a frog, but will eventually get to us, too. (And in some research, it already has: American male youths have lower levels of testosterone; the birth rate for males is actually decreasing, and there’s still the question of what’s causing all the ADHD, autism, depression, and cancers). And for all the unambiguous gains due to the use of chemicals, when the water contains trace amounts of every single thing we put on or in ourselves or our land and you’re contemplating genderless or mutated frogs incapable of reproducing, it’s a little difficult not to feel that something eerie and peculiar and upside-down is happening.

And there are the conflicts and the wars and the pretexts. And people shooting because that’s what they were once ordered to do. Then the other team has to shoot back. And so on. Sometimes there’s a reason. Sometimes we only say there is. And sometimes, in some places, even those fighting admit that they don’t know why: that’s just what they’ve always done. And how in Africa (of course it is Africa; these stories are always in Africa), just over the weekend in Congo, an entire village was gang-raped: all the women, including grandmothers, and many of the children. And in other villages, the children are simply kidnapped, handed weapons, told to kill their families, and to kill or be killed. They are turned into soldiers for a non-army in a non-war. They are fighting because that’s what they’ve always done and no one stopped to ask “what for?” and besides, the government (such as it is) is following them and they’d be in trouble if they stopped. And so they go on.

And even in small, trivial matters, it all seems a bit bizarre, if I think about it much. Here, where there’s the gift of peace and occasional leisure, we have a steady diet of reality shows which ostensibly are about design or art or food. And they can be fun to watch. But the whole point seems really to be not celebrating human ingenuity or creativity, but participating vicariously in the subtle thrills of back-biting, back-stabbling, and other assorted methods of carping, sniping, and judging. The most vicious, catty comment is the highlight. The tearing down of another person, if wittily done, is the most entertaining. Only: we as people have declared bear-baiting inhumane. We no longer gather at arenas to watch people in shackles try to outrun big game cats. We like to think we are more modern and enlightened than that. But what is all the snark if not just another bloodsport, really?

It just seems to me that we all arrive in this world and we learn it and accept it. And when we grow up, we are just too busy, too threatened, too inundated and distracted by the living of life that we never have the opportunity to look at it long enough to ask ourselves if it’s really the one we want. If this life, this world, is the one we wanted or the best we can do. And maybe it is. And that would be fine, too. But I wonder sometimes if what we really need is just to halt everything for one day. To close all the non-essential things (and some of the “essential” ones, too) so that everybody could just stop for one second and look. Daydream. Think. Question. Or just breathe.

I need a snow day. And, judging from the looks of things, the entire world needs one, too.

of sailing ships and sealing wax

  • Wherefore art thou, Cincinnatus? Primary season is almost through and Midterm election nuttery has been kicking at least since Scott Brown was elected to fill the late Senator Kennedy’s seat. Members of House and Senate alike are promising “change” and trying to maintain their precarious balance on the line between of Washington and not-at-all part of Washington. Politickery is fun and elections are high politickery, so how can I complain that I am weary of politickery from the majority of these people? These same tired people who probably once meant well, wanting to serve their country, but got to Washington and too often decided to be Red or Blue instead of American; these same tired people who got to Washington and then decided never, ever to leave? I will enjoy the campaigns and the elections. I will laugh heartily and often. I will drink every time I hear “to be clear/let’s be clear here” or “I’m going to Washington to take/get your government back” (the definitive list for this election cycle is still to be determined). But. I will also miss the glassy-eyed naivete of the patriotic mythology that had Mr. Smith Going to Washington, or good solid citizens with gravitas who, upon election, quit campaigning for a seat long enough to sit down in it and do something real. And then actually went home again, voluntarily and on purpose.
  • You were supposed to use your magic wand. Obviously. Not to get too much in the mire about the BP/Gulf apocalyptic nightmare from hell, however: President Obama’s ratings are slipping (and why that would matter more than the actual crisis, I don’t know, but it sure gets talked about as though it were very nearly as important) and everyone’s wondering “why isn’t he doing something/more? Is this President Obama’s Katrina!?” For starters, what exactly is he supposed to do? Using only the powers of the executive branch, what is he to do? He’s been there 4 times, deployed ships and men, directed Holder to start investigating for criminal wrongdoing, sent down Steven Chu and a brain trust to think. He held an hour-long press conference to answer the same tired questions that have been asked since the whole thing went down 6 weeks ago. But people want him to solve the issue (it’s bad, not easily solvable and being irked at the government isn’t going to fix the well or restore the water or save the fish or employ the people) and, failing that, they want more emotion. They want the photo op. To paraphrase David Brooks: the president was elected because he is cool in a crisis and now people are mad because he is cool in a crisis. “We” want the theatricality, the “optics” (this word is definitely in the drinking game) of President Obama surrounded by fishermen, expressing highly visible emotion. Seriously? If a photo op is all it takes; if the solution is the floor show, well, then give him a flight suit and unfurl a banner declaring the problem solved. Victory over BP, the oil, environmental calamity, fill in problem “x.” But me, I don’t want a pretend president. I don’t want the story acted out. I don’t want the optics. I want to take the very real bad and deal with it. I want the president not to be concerned, to not have to be concerned, with his stage presence. He’s one man. The government is made of ordinary people; the people working on this aren’t magical: there’s really only so much they can do (and that, at least, they had better).  There will be plenty of time to scream over what should have been done before this all happened (criminal negligence, anyone? corruption? bueller?). But maybe we should deal with the now (the actual “now”, not the optical now) first.